I hope I am not offending anyone by this thread,
I am more talking to the masses then a select few. As for overkill versus underkill, there is a large area between these two statements. Overkill is most always there, not just with equipment but in building also, and I am not for one instant to go underkill, but there is a lot of room for improvement.
We are sending the wrong signal to those who have an interest in these larger models by always going for the most expensive because someone said we had to.
If you get a top name , well know pilot, starting to use 4 servos on the throttle, I'm willing to bet , a lot of people will start believing you actually need this to be competitive.
During the TOC years , people were saying DA engines where the best because TOC pilots used them , well all of the pilots were offered this engine for free , and I remember one declined because he was already sponsored by 3W. but the fact remains , people thought they were the only engine worth getting because of this.
So yes a lot of freebees for sponsored pilots, which doesn't help the newbees.
As for the Taranis, here is why they are not expensive, , first they are open source, second they didn't develop a high price dedicated chip processessor, they are using the ARM 32 which is very powerful chip. Also they do not advertise, advertising is very expensive. and they don't sponsor pilots or events , the only marketing strategy is word of mouth.
Hmmm... I understand the analogy you are trying to make, but in this case... Since the TOC pilots were offered sponsorship from all the engine companies, thus neutralizing the "I'll fly it in the biggest contest in the world because it's free concept", I think they flew what they felt would give them the best performance.