Agree....I don't think the copying is the issue. I don't have strong feelings either way about the copy debate. I know I wouldn't personally cite copying and stealing schemes, as has been said here, as my reason to not buy from HK. None of the copies are 1 for 1 copies but they are still copies. That Viper has a number of differences from the 3DHS plane just like the EME differences. And Skywing absolutely copies schemes too. Again not 1 for 1. So my takeaway from here is copying is ok as long as its not HK.
Not taking any sides but my Skywing is pretty much an exact replica of my 3dhs foamie. Came from the same place Im sure (skywing was given to me as a gift)
So did you love it?
Aren't the crack yaks great? I've had mine for about 10 flights and what a confidence builder for rollers. Really performs much better than the Edge IMO. Makes better lines and really rolls! Just fun.
As for the copy/ copyright issues. Schemes are usually taken from full scale inspirations so that's not an issue of copying a design. If there's a copyright on the scheme that's another story. Design fraud is a touchy subject for sure. I'm not sure what kind of protections are out there but I'm guessing many model manufacturers don't patent their designs. If that's the case it's up to the market to judge and determine the "winner". Not saying legal is always "right". All industries deal with "knock offs". Why should the hobby industry be any different. You be the judge with your $. Whatever you choose have fun!
Aren't the crack yaks great? I've had mine for about 10 flights and what a confidence builder for rollers. Really performs much better than the Edge IMO. Makes better lines and really rolls! Just fun.
sukhoi26mx said:No one does. Ask Chris how that went the first time around with Sammy (TOC1). Also, when you have a USA company like RCG actively engaging with and allowing (actively endorsing) a company like HK that shamelessly steals and promotes others designs on the very website that benefited dramatically from our original involvement (think SA, MM, 3DHS, EF, etc...), you've got a company (RCG) that has lost sight of what it originally was. I'm done here. I'm also done with the hobby in any commercial sense. Did you see the multi-page HK spread in Model Aviation's last issue? I simply can't be a part of this any longer. I've had the pleasure to interact with lots of really great people, Ben, Thayer, Bill, Doug, Arron, etc. For that I'm grateful. Good luck fellas.
Scott
And just in case anyone else wants to question why we at 3DRCForums despise HobbyKing, you can look no further than this example right here from RCG.
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24557414&postcount=31707
Good job HK & RCG, you've sucessfully chased one of the best RC designers out of our 3D community. Shameful.
I completely agree. HK is just getting bolder and bolder and it's because places like RCG enable them. It's really sad. Actually, you said it best - it's just downright shameful.