• If you are new to GiantScaleNews.com, please register, introduce yourself, and make yourself at home.

    We're 1st in Giant Scale RC because we've got the best membership on the internet! Take a look around and don't forget to register to get all of the benefits of GSN membership!

    Welcome!

The 'What did you do in your workshop tonight?' thread

Bartman

Defender of the Noob!
Extreme Flight 300EX, 45" wingspan, nice little airplane, it's very delicate but other than some hangar rash and wear from use it's in great shape. I'll probably sell this one and keep the one in the background. Nice guy that I bought them from, he and his young son took the two planes with an RC car they wanted. The seller wouldn't separate the planes from the car.


IMG_20180320_191241020.jpg
IMG_20180320_191023259.jpg
IMG_20180320_185728456.jpg
IMG_20180320_185704716.jpg
IMG_20180320_173221825.jpg
 

stangflyer

I like 'em "BIG"!
@Bartman If it's 45" span don't think it's a proto but regular production. If it helps ......the year I saw him and the plane at Perry was either 2002 or 2003.

Found this vid from 11 years ago......Seems about right
So have we reached a plateau? When I built my first model in 1994, which was not really all that long ago...things were...well what they were. Gas engines were bulky, and not very reliable. Airframes were also bulky. Heavy, tanks made of armor embedded ply wood. And though they flew, only a few hands could make them fly light as a feather. Or seemingly so that is. Fast forward to when I came back to the hobby in 2010, things were soooo different. Engines went on crash diets and became power houses. Airframes also went on the Jenny Craig diet plan. But strong and definitely light. Everything seemed to be a whole new world. Now you show us a video of about ten years ago...(2008) and the difference from then to today is not really all that different. That little Extra is one bad ass little 'Lectrified wonder. I wonder now, what will the next ten years hold for change...if any.
 

stangflyer

I like 'em "BIG"!
Ok fellas...I have a question for "everyone" that has flown 50cc gas powered planes....a lot. First the brief previous logic. I have always "over" sized the tanks in my planes for the simple fact that "if" I needed that extra time to get a bird down safely, I wanted the fuel reserve to do it. And thus far, it has not been an issue. Examples: The 157cs, the 170 and my 212cs usually burn about half the fuel that is in the tank for a normal 10 or so minute flight. i.e, 260, Sukhoi have 50 ounce tanks. The Behemoth Yak also has a 50 ouncer. On my 100cc'ers I run a 32 ounce and again, about half a tank or better when I land. This has been a good rule of thumb for me. However once again having a 50cc plane, I want to do things a bit different. I am not going to run the elaborate onboard systems I have in the past. Meaning, one flight pack instead of two. Or two much smaller packs vs. the size I normally would use. Rx. only and no power expander. Probably Hitec 7954 servos simply because they are an all around good servo for most any application. Singled out or ganged two or three per surface, they do an impeccable job. And they have great centering as well. But as for tank size, I don't want to run the norm of what I have in the past. 24 ounces seems like a lot. But I really don't remember what a 50cc sized engines fuel consumption rate is. I have read some posts saying a DLE 55 will "sip" about an ounce a minute. Others have done elaborate calculations and have come up with 1.69 ounces per minute. I want to keep this 50cc Edge as light and as inexpensive to build as possible. So that being said, what have all of you 50cc flyer guys used for tank size? What is your normal fuel consumption rate? What type of flying? How hard are you on the throttle? Warbird or Aerobatic? Bottom line...is a 17 ounce tank enough for some "beat the snot" outta your plane flying? What do you guys use?
 

49dimes

Damn I'm hungry
I have always had a 16 -18 oz tank in all my 50/60 and even 70cc planes. 10 minute hard flying but throttle management. Full power on up lines and where needed to get a maneuver in. Hovering and low and slow takes only 1/2 throttle or less. Always had at least a quarter of a tank or more when landing. That was then this is now.....shorter 4-7 minute flights... attempts to do things and correct A LOT and use full power to get out of trouble and still land decent. About 1/2 to 2/3 full when I land. If I where to use a larger tank it would be for CG reasons but my tanks never get low enough (at 16-18oz) to start to make the plane a bit tail heavy.
 
Top