64" mxs exp

[Bloosee]

It would likely work but it's 3.5 ounces heavier tham the motor everyone seems to choose, the 4315-500. I wonder if there would be room to move the battery back far enough to offset the added weight on the nose. It would probably be better suited the heavier Aerobeez 64 MXS.

 

[Bushwacker]

You wouldn't be trying to sell an Aerobeez plane now would ya. On a EF board.
You talking about the 64" MXS-R? Thought they were running the A60 in that one.

 

[Bloosee]

You wouldn't be trying to sell an Aerobeez plane now would ya. On a EF board.
You talking about the 64" MXS-R? Thought they were running the A60 in that one.

Haha, MXS-R, yeah, sneaked that in there hoping nobody would notice..... I actually think the 4320 would be perfect, I've been told the Aerobeez flies a little heavy on electric since it's actually a gas plane, so it could probably use the power and weight of that motor. I would not put the 4320 on an EF 60 inch. I had a 60 EF yak that was perfect on the 4315, I would have not wanted the extra weight or power of the 4320.

 

[Bushwacker]

Humm good to know...Some good info bro.

 

[YellowJacketsRC]

The MXS runs nose heavy. If you put the 4320 on it, you are definitely going to have to add tail weight.

 

[Soon to be 3D ace]

I have a problem with mine the wing tube was to big so I had to sand it for like a hour just so I did not break the wing getting it on and off will maiden it soon

 

[AKNick]

crazy, most wing tubes are pretty stiff to begin with and loosen up a bit with time. Sounds as if QC missed that one!

 

[Soon to be 3D ace]

More like went to lunch it was bad

 

[Soon to be 3D ace]

More like went to lunch

 

[3dmike]

I have a problem with mine the wing tube was to big so I had to sand it for like a hour just so I did not break the wing getting it on and off will maiden it soon

I've had to do this on two big birds in the past year, 50cc Redwing 330sc and a 35% Pilot.