• If you are new to GiantScaleNews.com, please register, introduce yourself, and make yourself at home.

    We're 1st in Giant Scale RC because we've got the best membership on the internet! Take a look around and don't forget to register to get all of the benefits of GSN membership!

    Welcome!

Scale Don Smith P-51 Mustang

Snoopy1

640cc Uber Pimp
Stang have a question, I know there are many ways of doing it but just curious how you go about it. This concerns the final weight of the plane. Do you make a spreadsheet and to see what your final weight will be approximately. Or do work back from the wing area and say no more than this. Or do you build it as you would like it to be and as light as possible. Just interested to know how you go about it. Me personally I work back from the wing area come up with a WCL and make a detailed spreadsheet of all the components. Then subtract that from the calculated weight and then see what the plane frame work should be.
 

stangflyer

I like 'em "BIG"!
Not saying it is right, wrong or otherwise. In all honesty, I am trying to keep things into perspective. I understand this is a warbird and will build heavier than most any other plane of its same size. But taking into consideration, it is basically an enlarged 35% plane. So in perspective, most normal 100cc (35%) planes come in around 26 to 32 pounds. With 32 being on the heavy side. I have seen a few of these Mustangs come in around the 26 pound mark, but not many. Most are in the 32 to 40 pound range. Ok, that being said... I am looking at the construction of the plane and deciding on what I can save in weight where ever I can. For example, the fuse is a good place to start. The 1/8" Balsa sheeting was old stock Bud Nosen. Very dense and extremely heavy. :dancing-poop:canned that for lighter less dense wood. How much weight did I save? I have no idea but know it had to be at least a pound or two. Instead of the heavy chunk of 3/4" ply for the firewall/motor mount, I have opted for a much thinner and lighter firewall that will be strategically placed in the motor box. My 100cc Pilot Edge fuse bone dry was around 6 and 3/4 pounds. My 330 was around 8 if I remember right. (40% 122") And the big Yak was 9 and a half if memory serves. Using that as a guide line I tried to keep the fuse to 8 or less pounds. It worked. I remember back when my son and I first started building. We really-REALLY over did things. Way over kill. 1/4x20 "STEEL" bolts for wing bolts. Extra heavy duty hardware. Heavy and I do mean dense heavy balsa and hard wood blocks. We figured that this was the only way to make a plane strong. Not so much. Fast forward, my son now being an ex airframe structural engineer giggles when we talk about how we used to do things. He is the one that has been really giving me some good sound advice on practices and so far it is paying off. So no spread sheet. No mystical graphs or formulas or anything like that. I am just trying to keep things as light as possible and at the same time, using my head and using knowledge of how the full scale planes are built. Example, who knew the ailerons on a KC135 are attached with simple 1/4x20 bolts? I didn't until my son clued me in. Who knows the thickness of the skin on a 747? 0.039in (0.99mm). I used to think that a plane, full scale or rc...got its strength from the structure. Not really so much. Formers give shape, the skin...(balsa sheeting) gives it the strength. So in reality, I am relying solely on overall structure and build practices.

The tail group will be built according to plan with one exception. I am going to build the stabs...(or at least try) so that they are removable. So I know there will be extra weight there. How much? I figure I will be adding a pound with the ply ribs and tube and sleeves. I can not see them being heavier than a 40% set of stabs. The 330's were about 1.5 pounds. Dressed, about 2.5 pounds. So the big Stang should be around 2.5 to 3 pounds. Lets say 3.

The wings on the other hand are going to be a challenge. My 40% Sukhoi wings are 4.5 pounds dressed. (servos and such) 330 are also about the same. The big Yak wings are roughly 5 pounds. But they have three servos per side and are "HUGE". So taking into consideration the structure, the extra braces, the three sections...(center, left and right wings), Then add the landing gear. The landing gear on all my other birds range from about a pound and a half to 2.5 pounds. (Not exact-but pretty close guessing) That is with wheels by the way. The gear for the Stang are 5 pounds total. That is including the tail gear and all wheels. By the way, those weights on the wings are each wing panel. The Big Yak being around 10 total. So how much will the Mustang wings weigh? In reality, I am going to count on 14-16 pounds.

Then we have the beast Kolm at 16 pounds. Prop, spinner and hangar assembly, put that to 19 pounds. Next we add electronics. (Servos-wiring-batteries and such) Depending on how elaborate and entailed I get... 9 at the least on servos. 9x2.5 ounces=22.5 ounces. If I do the exras like I want, probably 13 servos. 32.5 ounces. That is just shy of three pounds just for servos. Then we have air cylinders for the vent doors on the fuse. Tubing and air tank for the retracts. Misc. hardware and assorted linkages, horns and arms.

And lets not forget the final fuse construction at around another pound. (Still under 8 pounds)

So here is my mystical formula.
Fuse=8.0
Main wings=16.0
Tail group (fin included) =4.0
Engine and assembly=19
Servos and electronics=7.0
Then we add glassing and paint=4.0
That makes a total of 58 pounds.

I really don't think this is an unrealistic number as Thomas Gass' CARF Mustang came in at about 23.3 kg (51.368 pounds) I would really like to beat that 58 pounds by at least 10 if I can. I suppose if a guy built the plane according to plan and kept it strict, he could build it for around the numbers that Don Smith gives. 39 to 45 pounds. But that is with fixed gear and a 7 pound 95cc single cylinder engine and nothing spectacular built in. Thinking back to the Pitts build, I was projecting a final AUW and actually came pretty close. If not for the heavy 3w 70 twin, I could have made it with weight to spare. I honestly expect the Mustang to come in around 46 to 54 pounds.

Guess we will see what it weighs when I am done.
 

Snoopy1

640cc Uber Pimp
Not saying it is right, wrong or otherwise. In all honesty, I am trying to keep things into perspective. I understand this is a warbird and will build heavier than most any other plane of its same size. But taking into consideration, it is basically an enlarged 35% plane. So in perspective, most normal 100cc (35%) planes come in around 26 to 32 pounds. With 32 being on the heavy side. I have seen a few of these Mustangs come in around the 26 pound mark, but not many. Most are in the 32 to 40 pound range. Ok, that being said... I am looking at the construction of the plane and deciding on what I can save in weight where ever I can. For example, the fuse is a good place to start. The 1/8" Balsa sheeting was old stock Bud Nosen. Very dense and extremely heavy. :dancing-poop:canned that for lighter less dense wood. How much weight did I save? I have no idea but know it had to be at least a pound or two. Instead of the heavy chunk of 3/4" ply for the firewall/motor mount, I have opted for a much thinner and lighter firewall that will be strategically placed in the motor box. My 100cc Pilot Edge fuse bone dry was around 6 and 3/4 pounds. My 330 was around 8 if I remember right. (40% 122") And the big Yak was 9 and a half if memory serves. Using that as a guide line I tried to keep the fuse to 8 or less pounds. It worked. I remember back when my son and I first started building. We really-REALLY over did things. Way over kill. 1/4x20 "STEEL" bolts for wing bolts. Extra heavy duty hardware. Heavy and I do mean dense heavy balsa and hard wood blocks. We figured that this was the only way to make a plane strong. Not so much. Fast forward, my son now being an ex airframe structural engineer giggles when we talk about how we used to do things. He is the one that has been really giving me some good sound advice on practices and so far it is paying off. So no spread sheet. No mystical graphs or formulas or anything like that. I am just trying to keep things as light as possible and at the same time, using my head and using knowledge of how the full scale planes are built. Example, who knew the ailerons on a KC135 are attached with simple 1/4x20 bolts? I didn't until my son clued me in. Who knows the thickness of the skin on a 747? 0.039in (0.99mm). I used to think that a plane, full scale or rc...got its strength from the structure. Not really so much. Formers give shape, the skin...(balsa sheeting) gives it the strength. So in reality, I am relying solely on overall structure and build practices.

The tail group will be built according to plan with one exception. I am going to build the stabs...(or at least try) so that they are removable. So I know there will be extra weight there. How much? I figure I will be adding a pound with the ply ribs and tube and sleeves. I can not see them being heavier than a 40% set of stabs. The 330's were about 1.5 pounds. Dressed, about 2.5 pounds. So the big Stang should be around 2.5 to 3 pounds. Lets say 3.

The wings on the other hand are going to be a challenge. My 40% Sukhoi wings are 4.5 pounds dressed. (servos and such) 330 are also about the same. The big Yak wings are roughly 5 pounds. But they have three servos per side and are "HUGE". So taking into consideration the structure, the extra braces, the three sections...(center, left and right wings), Then add the landing gear. The landing gear on all my other birds range from about a pound and a half to 2.5 pounds. (Not exact-but pretty close guessing) That is with wheels by the way. The gear for the Stang are 5 pounds total. That is including the tail gear and all wheels. By the way, those weights on the wings are each wing panel. The Big Yak being around 10 total. So how much will the Mustang wings weigh? In reality, I am going to count on 14-16 pounds.

Then we have the beast Kolm at 16 pounds. Prop, spinner and hangar assembly, put that to 19 pounds. Next we add electronics. (Servos-wiring-batteries and such) Depending on how elaborate and entailed I get... 9 at the least on servos. 9x2.5 ounces=22.5 ounces. If I do the exras like I want, probably 13 servos. 32.5 ounces. That is just shy of three pounds just for servos. Then we have air cylinders for the vent doors on the fuse. Tubing and air tank for the retracts. Misc. hardware and assorted linkages, horns and arms.

And lets not forget the final fuse construction at around another pound. (Still under 8 pounds)

So here is my mystical formula.
Fuse=8.0
Main wings=16.0
Tail group (fin included) =4.0
Engine and assembly=19
Servos and electronics=7.0
Then we add glassing and paint=4.0
That makes a total of 58 pounds.

I really don't think this is an unrealistic number as Thomas Gass' CARF Mustang came in at about 23.3 kg (51.368 pounds) I would really like to beat that 58 pounds by at least 10 if I can. I suppose if a guy built the plane according to plan and kept it strict, he could build it for around the numbers that Don Smith gives. 39 to 45 pounds. But that is with fixed gear and a 7 pound 95cc single cylinder engine and nothing spectacular built in. Thinking back to the Pitts build, I was projecting a final AUW and actually came pretty close. If not for the heavy 3w 70 twin, I could have made it with weight to spare. I honestly expect the Mustang to come in around 46 to 54 pounds.

Guess we will see what it weighs when I am done.
Thanks for that well all I can say that is a pretty detailed spreadsheet. You are working form known facts and adding in the difference and coming up,with a predictable weight. I can see that it would be difficult on a plane that you have never built before.
 

stangflyer

I like 'em "BIG"!
I need to get wing and stab tubes ordered. I'd really appreciate some input guys. Best place to get cf wing/stab tunes and sleeves?
 

Snoopy1

640cc Uber Pimp
I got mine from TNT the quality was very good but I had weight almost a year to it very frustrating. I found it very difficult to get. And yes I have heard that the tubes that J-tec have are good as well. Fibertech has tubes as well.
 

Alky6

150cc
I got mine from TNT the quality was very good but I had weight almost a year to it very frustrating. I found it very difficult to get. And yes I have heard that the tubes that J-tec have are good as well. Fibertech has tubes as well.




I didn’t like the TNT aluminum tubes with the cardboard sleeves. The fit was pretty terrible. Lots of slop between the tube and sleeve. Ended up having to put tape on the tube to tighten it up.
 

Snoopy1

640cc Uber Pimp
I didn’t like the TNT aluminum tubes with the cardboard sleeves. The fit was pretty terrible. Lots of slop between the tube and sleeve. Ended up having to put tape on the tube to tighten it up.
I have never got an aluminum tube from them only a carbon tube.
 

stangflyer

I like 'em "BIG"!
I have been poking around the internet today looking for photos for documentation and schemes. I found a few ( 7 actually) of my favorites and thought I would share.

I have always loved Ferocious Frankie. Probably ever since I seen the video of "Sketches of Freedom".

Feroucious Frankie.jpg

Another favorite is Gunfighter, and truthfully may be the one scheme that I would duplicate in perfect detail. I like color and different. I have not seen many (actually none) Gunfighter RC Stangs.

GF 1.jpg GF 2.jpg

Then we have Gentleman Jim.. Just simple and clean.

GJ 1.jpg GJ 2.jpg

Back when I started in this hobby, I always wanted a big Mustang. And Grim Reaper was very very high on the scheme list. Still like it a lot.

Grim Reaper 1.jpg Grim Reaper 2.jpg

Moonbeam McSwhine is kind of cool, but very much like so many other "Stangs". Just different markings and names. Paint is pretty much the same.

Moonbeam.jpg

One of my all time favorites is Obsession. A lot of color and definitely stands out. This one is still a "definite possibility perhaps maybe". LOL

Obsession 2.jpg Obsession.jpg

And then we have Slender, Tender and Tall. I don't see this plane in many airshow line ups. And I have never seen an rc airplane with this scheme. Maybe the DS will be the first?

Slender Tender and Tall.jpg

What do you think fellas? What is your favorite scheme. Post your photos here. I would love to see the diverse "love" for the mighty Stang.
 
Top