49dimes
Damn I'm hungry
I don't know about safer. Much heavier for sure. On my race boats, we turn a 6.5" 4-blade propeller (steel alloys) about 10,000 rpm (they are super-cavitating, or surfacing - and run half in half out of the water), therefore have much higher cyclical loading than an aircraft propeller, but... I can see where you would run into cracking problems due to fatigue. We would thin the blades as much as we dare to get both acceleration and top end, but usually when you found a "good one" it would no sooner let a blade go. That usually ends in a similar result as noted previously where the pieces of the engine and lower unit housing go missing. Have a very strict policy to never have anyone standing radially from the propeller (in front with airplanes as well). At least with wood and carbon the density is so much lower your resultant "projectile" has less kinetic energy than a similar metal design, IMHO.
You make a very good point. And I am certainly just adding to content here. You have to keep in mind that slapping a much more dense material as water vice air is much more violent and understandably would cause fatigue and stress failure at a higher rate.
To me a "projectile" is a projectile and I personally do not want to be in front of it all be it wood, carbon or aluminum.
I am curious to just how far off that missing piece of Terry's prop landed???