Under the variable forces and circumstances that can cause prop failure it is mostly recognized that wood is the better choice simply for safety reasons (actually insurance hoping liability would be reduced) but that was in due consideration that at the time when engines rarely exceeded 2.5 hp .
Now lets take Terry's DLE 85. 8.5 hp . 4X's the driving force to potentially send that splinter over supersonic speed. Or better yet 18 hp of brute force not just to only send a piece on its way but on its way with authority! (kinetic energy and kenny from south park).
Why does it matter if it is wood, carbon, composite or aluminum???. And it was a material ( wood ) failure causing all the havoc on Terry's plane. Now lets take an even more dense material such as aluminum. Does this same type of incident happen??? I think the insurance odds if studied would say NO! In regards to prop strikes. Is not aluminum just more likely to bend??? (You can make aluminum only so hard with silicon). It is still going to bend and not necessarily snap off like a hardened steel that is brittle.
When it comes to human flesh it's a game of rock paper scissors. This video is graphic but the message is "Being Safe" around propellers and highly "aware" of potential danger. Not "more safe" propellers. I would show a training film I have from my Navy days but it WAY to graphic. This one makes a "typical" point of appeal...... Oh!.....I group props and bullets in the same safety category.lol
Remember when the first female surgeon general said "We need to make bullets more safe" LMAO.