Bill Vargas
50cc
Joe, what are the BIG props you plan to stock? Something in the 36 x XX range perhaps?
Looking for a new engine in this size but know nothing about this engine or its history. Did some Google search but found nothing that will help make a decision. Also nothing on YouTube. Just info from the manufacture but nothing from the RC community. Love to see one run on a bench, does anyone have one, has anyone see The engine in a plane. Looking at the 112cc b2 ZDZ
Joe, what are the BIG props you plan to stock? Something in the 36 x XX range perhaps?
Thanks @Terryscustom , that is what I was going to say. He has tried everything under the sun. It is great to know that he is so knowledgeable and has tested all the brands.The canada guy's have tested this engine every way to sunday. I think @Bdegan and @tbrum have done the most. The 112 seems to be swinging very close to DA120 props and almost no vibration. Part of what caught my eye.
Lots of video's on youtube, check out some of Brad Egan's: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=zdz112
No water in the fuel is key. Typically aviation grade fuels get filtered with "coalescer" and "hydrophobic" elements to remove standing water and "entrained" water (water that is actually diluted in the fuel) . Anti icing agents also added. Fuel line freeze up was the biggest concern. Typical paper elements to filter out particulates to less than .01ppm. However most of us will never fly high enough to have any "icing" issues. Keeping fuel systems clean and your gas can clean and sealed during storage is very important. For those of us that have to run pump gas I find 87 octane does better to keep engine running cooler. I have tried 93 and found no power advantage and actually lost power because the engine would heat up faster under load. It is a good idea to try and make a filtering system that you can circulate your pump gas in the can before using it in your plane for better debris removal.
As far as additives.......sea foam.......stabil......etc.. Small engine manufacturers will recommend it because they want you buying more of their small engines. Water and particulates are fuels and your worst enemy.
Interesting info. Where did you get that?
I would tend to trust those 2 guys, as they put in the stick time to get these engines to rock!The canada guy's have tested this engine every way to sunday. I think @Bdegan and @tbrum have done the most. The 112 seems to be swinging very close to DA120 props and almost no vibration. Part of what caught my eye.
Lots of video's on youtube, check out some of Brad Egan's: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=zdz112
Geez Dimes you're very knowledable about fuel or did you just stay at a Holiday Inn Express?....[emoji6]No water in the fuel is key. Typically aviation grade fuels get filtered with "coalescer" and "hydrophobic" elements to remove standing water and "entrained" water (water that is actually diluted in the fuel) . Anti icing agents also added. Fuel line freeze up was the biggest concern. Typical paper elements to filter out particulates to less than .01ppm. However most of us will never fly high enough to have any "icing" issues. Keeping fuel systems clean and your gas can clean and sealed during storage is very important. For those of us that have to run pump gas I find 87 octane does better to keep engine running cooler. I have tried 93 and found no power advantage and actually lost power because the engine would heat up faster under load. It is a good idea to try and make a filtering system that you can circulate your pump gas in the can before using it in your plane for better debris removal.
As far as additives.......sea foam.......stabil......etc.. Small engine manufacturers will recommend it because they want you buying more of their small engines. Water and particulates are fuels and your worst enemy.