stangflyer
I like 'em "BIG"!
I ran into a similar issue with my big Yak. There simply is "NO" resolution on the Pilot 40% Yak 54 running the 3w 210. The cylinders on the 210 are simply too large to allow a header and canister configuration setup. Stock exhaust is the only option. If I were to go to a smaller diameter cylinder engine, then the canister options open up for the Yak. Which by the way is what I am in the process of doing. But....I do see a difference between the construction of your air frame and mine. You see, my big Yak has a plate spanning the distance from left to right fuse sides. It is part of the fuse construction in the belly of the Yak and "CAN NOT" be eliminated. I don't see this on your plane. How are the gear mounted on your Inversa? If you are only shy 5/16" for clearance with your canister stinger and how it will sit in the can supports....how about using "Hardwood" blocks between the gear and the fuse? In essence, giving you the distance needed to clear the canister. The "footprint" of the gear will remain the same and surface area contact should not change. Strength of the gear supports should not be compromised either. If by adding a 5/16" hardwood block between the gear and the fuse and getting slightly longer bolts in which to mount the gear, it could be the answer you are looking for to keep you from having to do some major modifications to the fuse that could compromise the over all structural integrity of the airframe. I would honestly design and manufacture the exact duplicate size of support/plates to put between the gear and the fuse. I really think this could solve your problem.
I have to agree with you regarding the "pre" assembly of these airframes by the manufacturers. I believe for the most part, when they are drawn up on the CAD programs, good engineers will be able to see certain anomalies before they occur. However sometimes something does slip through. I think it would help in the design of an airframe if they were pre assembled when ever an airframe is designed. Perhaps some manufacturers do this. Probably some don't. Hope this suggestion is of value and helps resolve your issue.
I have to agree with you regarding the "pre" assembly of these airframes by the manufacturers. I believe for the most part, when they are drawn up on the CAD programs, good engineers will be able to see certain anomalies before they occur. However sometimes something does slip through. I think it would help in the design of an airframe if they were pre assembled when ever an airframe is designed. Perhaps some manufacturers do this. Probably some don't. Hope this suggestion is of value and helps resolve your issue.
Last edited: